I am presently in Billings to teach an electrical
Code class (related to solar PV installations) to a handful of state electrical
inspectors. As I drove through Bozeman
yesterday, I got to thinking about a woman I once studied with in one of my
creative writing classes while I was at MSU in 1982. She came from Bozeman, and you might not opt
to fancy her as pretty unless you like huge round faces and unkempt hair. She admired tame ducks, vegetable gardens, gates
flung open, and on those occasions when she recited one of her flawless poems,
her voice might have been mistaken for a flute.
Her writings often stood without match in our writing class—stood
upright and glittering in poetic beauty.
But more often than not she became ensconced in feminism and rote
arguments against everything written by men.
Every time she finished a scathing critique of one of my works, she
ended with “You should try writing from a woman’s point-of-view.”
I really liked her.
A man’s point of view.
And I really sucked as a writer.
When a discussion about Nabokov’s Lolita
erupted on night as we were riding together in a car, we found ourselves camped
in positions on opposite hills, figuratively speaking. We soon began volleying rounds back and forth
into each other’s camp. As I mentioned,
I think she exuded the most talent of anyone in our class. But she interpreted the characters in Lolita
only after passing them through some manner of feminist litmus test.
While a litmus test to measure compounds for
alkalinity or acidity that might be handy for scientists in chemistry, similar
tests based on a single factor in studying literature may end up providing only
a profound disservice. Great literary
characters should defy such gross over-simplification. A simple test will not begin to penetrate the
depth of them.
My writer friend saw Humbert as an evil, over-sexed
man taking advantage of, corrupting an innocent young girl. End of story.
Certainly, I agreed that Humbert was, indeed, all of that. But he was also, at the same time, a victim,
too. He was a victim of his own
impulses, of circumstance, of (take this feminist swine) Lolita.
My friend had absolutely written one of the main
characters out of the book: Lolita.
Go ahead, call Lolita the protagonist if you
desire. But how do you explain away her
flouncing around? How about the way she
manipulates Humbert to attain favor?
What about the way both of them shoved Lo’s mother right out the window?
To this day…I wish I could write as perfectly as
that woman in my class...from a man’s point of view.
--Mitchell
Hegman