There is nothing wrong
with a qualified person. Qualified persons, on the other hand, are another
matter. Qualified persons annoy my
sister. They also annoy my technical
writing buddy.
Okay. I am not suggesting that actual people-type
persons are annoying my sister and my friend.
It’s the term “persons” that melts their ice cubes. “Why aren’t they qualified people or qualified personnel?” my sister will ask.
I should explain. This is all related to those times when I ask
my sister or my friend to proof-read the various training documents I produce.
The term “qualified
persons” is full tilt Code-speak.
Electric Code. Example: Only qualified persons are allowed to access
energized equipment.
The National Electrical Code thrives on this stuff.
I clearly recall the
first time I cracked open a Code book and read a few sections. “Geez, I hope if there is an English version
of this available,” I thought.
Nope. The Code is the Code, as electricians say. The whole “persons” thing is part of the Code
wanting to emulate old-timey English legal writing. And the National Electrical Code, as adopted
by local authorities having jurisdiction, is a legal document.
Yesterday, as I sat in a Code
training class watching Power Point slides, I giggled to myself each time qualified persons appeared on the screen. To hell with the rest of the world: qualified
electricians are persons.
--Mitchell
Hegman
How can you be so sure? Some of them could be extra-terrestials. :)
ReplyDeleteHaha. You may be correct!
ReplyDelete