Below is a list of ten fairly scientific “facts”
about love. Well, only three of them are
anywhere near facts. The facts are
thanks to an article written by Judy Dutton based on an interview with Dr.
Helen Fisher of Rutger’s University. Dr.
Fisher has spent an entire career attempting to scientifically understand love. The seven bogus facts are of my own invention,
though often researched extensively for inaccuracy.
See if you can pick out the correct facts. The three correct answers will be listed at
the end of the blog:
1. If
given a chance to choose between two particular type fonts when writing
business letters, Verdana
or Elephant, studies have
revealed that people in a relationship are five-times more likely to choose Elephant
than those who have recently endured a breakup.
2. People
who are in love are more likely to wear mismatched socks.
3. Feelings
of love trigger the release of dopamine in the brain—resulting in something
akin to a cocaine high.
4. The
average person falls in love only three times in a lifetime.
5. Everybody
loves a duck.
6. People
who are recently smitten by love produce serotonin (a neurotransmitter that
helps relay messages from one section of the brain to another) at the levels
often associated with people suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder.
7. Men
fall in love faster than women do.
8. Everybody
loves broccoli.
9. Intense
love lasts no more than one to three years.
10. Contrary
to popular myth, men do not base their initial attraction to a woman on physical
attributes alone.
--Mitchell
Hegman
Correct
Answers:
3, 7, and 9
For
the rest of the answers: fall in love or
surf the net.
To see the article
mentioned here: http://www.chemistry.com/datingadvice/LoveExplained
Humorous!
ReplyDeleteEverybody loves a duck!
DeleteI love Peking duck and Chinese style duck eggs. :)
Delete2 out of 3 for me - glad I chose "no" on #4. Have already been in love 3 times :-)
ReplyDeleteThere is no limit to loving.
DeleteAh yes "loving vs. in love" - there's a good blog for you...mine of course were 3 (in-love) marriages, and that's why I was encouraged by #4 here not being one of the three :-) I wouldn't rule out a 4th "in-love", but at my age the benefits, if any, in this day and age seem remote.
DeleteAs they say...2 outta 3 ain't bad!
ReplyDelete