In the age of tweeting, texting and instant
messaging words don’t matter as much.
Not actual words. Not words with
capital letters. Not words with both
vowels and consonants. “R u chillin?”
now qualifies as a sentence. 1432
translates into “I love you too.” IDTS
means “I don’t think so.”
Slang and abbreviated forms of communication have
always been with us. But the trend to
truncate today is widespread and runs deep into the use of language. The language is often blunt and without
beauty.
We are shrinking our vocabulary. As a whole, we simply don’t use as many
words. As example, the average teen in
America (and much of the rest of the world) has experienced a dramatic decline
in their overall vocabulary in the last fifty years. Fifty years ago a teen commanded something in
the vicinity of 24,000 words. Today, the
average teen has mastered somewhere near 10,000 words.
Clearly, the languages used for texting and tweeting
are of value. They offer a convenient
and concise form of messaging when such is required. Sometimes you need to communicate
quickly. As John Lennon said: “When you’re drowning you don’t think, I
would be incredibly pleased if someone would notice I’m drowning and come and rescue
me. You just scream.” But what if we lose both flourish and nuance
in our present state on constant expedience?
What if words like tintinnabulation vanish? Shouldn’t we all use that word at least once
in our life when describing the sound of church bells?
Maybe Jarod Kintz put it the best: “Writers fish for the right words like
fishermen fish for, um, whatever those aquatic creatures with fins and gills
are called.”
--Mitchell
Hegman
No comments:
Post a Comment