Once, while participating
in a labor union executive board meeting, I witnessed as two distinct sides
formed at the table when finances became the order of business. At issue: a proposed expenditure put forth by
Brother X.
The meeting quickly
heated. Some felt the expenditure unwarranted. Eventually, a man rose to his feet and spoke
in defense of Brother X. Unfortunately,
Brother X had by this time stopped listening to words, and heard only the man’s
tone, which was elevated. Brother X
blew-up at the man defending him.
After the dust settled a
bit, I nudged Brother X. “He was
defending you, dude.” I whispered.
I worry that I did not
take away enough from that incident. On
occasion, I find myself instantly bristling at the tone used by someone I am
conversing with. Sometimes, the way a
question is asked will trigger a glint of anger in me. Maybe a heavy tone (often only perceived) used
in a conversation “feels” like a direct challenge to me. This is especially true if I have been “stewing”
over the subject of discussion.
Unfortunately, I tend to respond
in a glaringly negative fashion. Following
the conversation, I may reflect back and realize that a simple bit of advice
was being rendered or a plain statement of fact was being made. A question might have been worthy of asking. Sometimes, upon consideration, I realize I
am, and always have been, in contract with whatever the point expressed. I jumped off the cliff because I listened to—and
misinterpreted—the tone and ignored the words.
I would like to stop this
behavior, but there seems no exact place where I might begin.
--Mitchell
Hegman
Actually you have begun to stop that behavior in simply recognizing and talking about your predicament.
ReplyDeleteI hope that is so.
ReplyDelete