In the 1960’s, La Disparition, a very odd novel
written by Georges Perec appeared on the literary scene. The novel—over 200 pages in length—made quite
a stir, though not for the contents or literary parallels. The novel made a splash for lacking
something.
The author wrote the entire novel without ever using the letter
“e.”
Consider this: the letter “e” is the commonest letter used in
writing. This letter appears in writing
something near 13 percent of the time.
The novel appeared originally in French, but was later translated into
English under the title: A Void.
Stop for a moment and try to compose a few sentences without using
an “e.”
It isn’t easy. You
cannot even use “the” in a sentence. Following is a slice of what the
author created:
“Today, by radio,
and also on giant hoardings, a rabbi, an admiral notorious for his links to
masonry, a trio of cardinals, a trio, too, of insignificant politicians…”
The reason for writing in this manner wholly evades me.
Why work so hard to maintain a hole? How radically must we alter our normal
process to get attention? At what point
does the means by which we alter our approach to creating a result become more
important than the result itself?
Equivalents to this kind of writing exist in our lives, too. Think about the aging spinster who excluded
entirely from her life all relations with men.
Consider the man who will not associate in any fashion with anyone from
the opposite political party.
I am not sure we are meant to try this hard.
I, for one, shall never abandon you, “e.”
—Mitchell Hegman
It's like choosing between art for art's sake or art with meaning.
ReplyDeleteThat's a great way of putting it!
ReplyDelete