Philosophers
rarely pass up an opportunity to invent crazy questions and then run straight off
a cliff while grappling with the questions.
Philosophers are the folks responsible for giving us, as example, this
question: Why is there something rather
than nothing? I suppose that is a
valid question, but I am presently a bit more concerned about where I left my twice-as-smarter-than-me-phone.
While
the rest of us have remained busy building an assortment of widgets to make
life “easier” and taking out our daily garbage, some in the metaphysical community
have been grappling with mathematics. No,
philosophers are not crunching numbers or making a cat’s cradle with string
theory. They are concerned about
something a bit more basic. The
metaphysical question underlying all is this: Did we invent mathematics or did humans merely discover the mathematic numbers
and logic that naturally underlies the operation of all things?
This
is not a new question. The question is
as ancient as Plato and as recent as (forgive me) Play-Doh. Plato argued that mathematics is the natural
glue that binds together the entire universe and that we simply discovered the existing
knit of numbers. Other philosophers have insisted, before eventually plunging
off a cliff, that we developed mathematics as a handy way to explain the
mystical clockworks surrounding us.
Play-Doh never actually made any claims for either school of thought,
but I have always had fun with Play-Doh.
There
is something to be said for fun.
Some
deep thinkers, operation under the assumption that math is an invention, have
managed a notable level of over-thinking.
On this side of the equation (forgive me again), several theories have
been developed. Logistic theory, for example, claims that math is simply an
extension of normal human logic. Formalist theory gives normal people a
headache. Intuitionist theory is wholly inexplicable. Fictionalist
theory, as I understand it, puts mathematics on equal footing with
fairytales such as Rapunzel.
Maybe
Play-Doh is onto something.
--Mitchell
Hegman
No comments:
Post a Comment